Showing posts with label Human Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human Rights. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Al Jazeera article: Lebanon MPs debate Palestinian refugee rights

Image Caption: Jumblatt, the Druze leader, backs the proposed law to grant Palestinian refugees basic rights [EPA]

Lebanon's parliament has tabled a proposal to offer basic rights to hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees.

The proposed legislation - the subject of a heated debate on Tuesday - would allow Palestinian refugees to work and own property in Lebanon. Nabih Berri, the parliament speaker, referred the bill to a committee for a one-month review.

Palestinian refugees have long been a controversial subject in Lebanon, and the debate cut across Lebanon's usual political alliances.

Saad Hariri, the Lebanese prime minister, supports the new legislation - as do Hezbollah and Amal, two of his chief rivals from the so-called March 8 alliance.

Walid Jumblatt, the Druze politician and head of the Progressive Socialist Party, also endorsed the bill.

"The Palestinian refugees have been waiting [for] 62 years, and we are not granting them the minimum of their rights," he said.


Christian concerns

A group of Christian parties, including the Phalange party and Lebanese Forces, opposed the measure, warning that it was a first step towards naturalising Lebanon's refugee population.

They worry that Palestinian refugees might eventually become Lebanese citizens. Most are Sunni Muslims, so their naturalisation would tip Lebanon's sectarian balance.

Sami Gemayel, a member of the Phalange party, said it would be unconstitutional.

The constitution includes a provision barring the "settlement of non-Lebanese in Lebanon".

"The Palestinian matter is a disputed issue, and a source of fear," Elie Marouni, an MP from the Phalange party, said.

Jumblatt called that position "stupid" and criticised "right-wing parties" for failing to distinguish between granting rights to Palestinian refugees and offering them citizenship.

The refugees are planning several major protests across Lebanon on June 27 to demand civil rights.

Crowded camps


More than 400,000 Palestinian refugees live in camps scattered across Lebanon. They do not enjoy the same rights as Lebanese citizens: refugees are barred from owning property, working, travelling overseas and receiving basic social services from the government.

The crowded camps have given rise to several armed groups. The Lebanese army fought a three-month battle in 2007 with one group, Fatah al-Islam, at the Nahr al-Bared refugee camp near Tripoli. More than 400 people, including dozens of civilians, were killed in the fighting.

Hariri said the poor conditions in the camps helped to create such groups.

"Should we deprive Palestinian refugees in Palestinian camps of their rights, so that they become terrorists in the future?" Hariri said during the parliamentary debate. "We have a historic opportunity to vote on this proposal."

But the proposal is controversial within Hariri's Future bloc too.

"Do not give to them [Palestinian refugees] the rights which are given to the Lebanese people," Atef Majdanani, a Future Movement MP, said.

Link to original article
read more...

Friday, June 11, 2010

Article in Daily Star-Lebanon: Ministry launches complaints office for migrant workers

June 2, 2010

BEIRUT: Labor Minister Butros Harb announced Tuesday the opening of a complaints office in his ministry along with issuing a guide to inform migrant workers about their rights and obligations.

“I am pleased to tell you that I launched my reform program that will target the administration along with initiating different projects,” the labor minister told reporters.

Harb made his announcement during a news conference he held at the headquarters of the Labor Ministry in the Beirut suburb of Shiyyah.

Among the attendants were representatives of states that have migrant workers in Lebanon along with civil society committees.

Harb disclosed that he launched two initiatives.

“The first one is related to reforming the administration and eradicating corruption along with a quicker processing of citizen’s formalities,” said Harb, as he vowed to support “principled” employees who rejected bribery.

Harb said the second initiative aimed at restoring the reputation of Lebanon at the international level as a state that respected the rights of migrant workers after some media outlets claimed the contrary.

But Harb explained that it was impossible for his ministry to accomplish its social goals and to “enhance the social protection network” of migrant workers if the state did not protect the rights of those workers regardless of their nationality or race.

“I decided today to address the situation in the administration which citizens complained about by opening a complaint office in the ministry that can be contacted via a hotline,” he said.

The minister said that applications to be filled by citizens with complaints would be distributed at all branches and sections of the Labor Ministry.

“They will be asked to file the applications if they encountered a misbehavior, a delay in their formalities or if they were asked to pay a bribe,” said Harb, adding that the form would be mailed to the complaints office.

Harb voiced readiness to receive “oral complaints” through the hotline as well.

He stressed that he would devote extra time every day to examine the forwarded complaints and refer them to the concerned judiciary.

Concerning the guide for migrant workers, Harb said it would be translated into 14 languages and distributed at all airports, seaports and border posts.

“The guide aims to introduce the migrant worker to their rights and obligations along with respecting agreements and international treaties signed by Lebanon,” said Harb.

While many domestic workers in Lebanon are treated with respect, others find themselves trapped in abusive circumstances. Many complain of having their passports confiscated, salaries withheld, or of psychological, sexual or verbal abuse.

“Our people are kind and they respect human rights, but the situation of domestic workers still lacks complementary measures” Harb added.

Also, Harb underlined his ministry’s keenness on protecting the Lebanese from any potential assault by their domestic workers.

“This will take place by checking migrant workers’ mental state, moral credentials and health,” said Harb.

In late April of 2010, an Egyptian national stabbed to death four members from the same family in the Iqleem al-Kharoub village of Ketermaya in Mount Lebanon. The man was later lynched by an angry crowd from the village. –The Daily Star

Link to original article

read more...

Thursday, June 3, 2010

LEBANON: Women, non-Lebanese children get raw deal

By: Simba Russeau

BEIRUT, July 22, 2008 – Thousands of children in Lebanon are denied full access to education, health-care and residency because they do not have Lebanese citizenship.

Lebanese women cannot pass on their nationality to their children and in the event of separation, it is the father who gains automatic custody, according to Lebanese nationality law.

There is a saying in Lebanon: The only woman you’ll see in parliament is the one wearing black, mourning for the death of her husband or brother, whose political mantle she has inherited.

In a country famed for being the region’s most socially liberal and politically democratic, just one woman, Bahia Hariri, the sister of slain former premier Rafik Hariri, became a member of Lebanon’s new unity cabinet, announced in early July.

Although Bahia was an MP before her brother’s assassination in 2005, women cabinet ministers such as Nayla Moawad, former minister of Social Affairs, or former Industry Minister Leila Solh, joined politics after their husband and father, respectively, died.

Women MPs

Women were only present in parliamentary life twice between 1952 and 1962 and then not again until three female members of parliament (MPs) won seats in the 1992 elections.

“Women’s groups are demanding a 35 percent quota in representation in the government, which would allow for issues such as the custody and nationality law to take precedence,” said activist Roula Masri.

”Women’s groups are demanding a 35 percent quota in representation in the government, which would allow for issues such as the custody and nationality law to take precedence.”

In the last Lebanese parliamentary elections in 2005 only three MPs out of 128 were women – far fewer than politically restricted neighbours such as Syria, which had 30 women MPs out of 250; Jordan which had 13 out of 165; and Egypt which had 31 out of 718. Parliamentary elections in Lebanon are due next April.

Women make up about 53 percent of the population – around two million citizens – while research by the Collective for Research and Training on Development Action (CRTDA) found that women aged 23-34 outnumber men by seven to one, because most young men are employed abroad.

While making great strides in the labour force, with women highly visible in sectors such as the media, advertising and design, poor political representation is hampering women’s ability to reform discriminatory laws, say activists.

CRTDA recently re-launched its “Nationality Campaign”, lobbying politicians on the right for women to nationalise their children if marrying non-Lebanese.

Nationality law

The nationality law was established in 1925 and partially reformed in 1994 in a complex decree.

According to a 2008 report by the non-governmental organisation (NGO) Frontiers Association, the 1994 amendment allows the child of a Lebanese mother and foreign father to gain Lebanese citizenship after the child’s marriage to a Lebanese, and at least five years uninterrupted residency in the country, including one year after marriage.

A more comprehensive reform to the nationality law has become mired in the political issue of the presence of tens of thousands of Syrian workers and 400,000 Palestinian refugees in Lebanon.

Some politicians have argued that to allow Lebanese women to nationalise the children they have with non-Lebanese, such as Syrians and Palestinians, would be to shake up the delicate sectarian demographic on which the country’s political system is founded.

But according to activist Masri, figures from the Interior Ministry from 2001 indicate that only 1,000 Lebanese women are married to foreigners, although she admits these need updating with field research.

“However, the issue is not about how many women are married to Palestinians, Syrians or other foreigners but that they have to amend this law to highlight that this is a human right,” she said.

Fewer rights

Even in simple, everyday tasks, women can find they have fewer rights than men.

Rania Choueiri, a jewellery designer who owns a shop on trendy Monot Street, recounts her story of trying to open a bank account for her son, Karim.

“They asked me where is his father,” said Rania. “I asked why they need his father when I am his mother and want an account for my son. They told me that only the father can open the account. I couldn’t believe it.”

Lebanon’s nationalisation campaign has harnessed social networking website Facebook. A group centred on discussion of the nationality law currently has some 8,000 members.

“Many Lebanese women abroad have children and would like to return to Lebanon with their families but are prohibited because they are unable to provide legal papers to their families,” said Masri.

Link to original article

read more...

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Now Lebanon Article: Pervert paradise

Written by: Hayeon Lee
Tuesday, April 06. 2010

There was an amazing explosion of energy Sunday at the Sports City Center as one of Ethiopia’s most popular singers, Teddy Afro performed to a sea of female Ethiopian fans. Hundreds – maybe thousands – of Ethiopian women working all over Lebanon came in with their best hair and colors, ready to shake it.

But there was a darker side. Many of the men at the concert, whether they were random Arab bystanders or “security” guards, were taking the opportunity of the Teddy Afro craze to touch and grab Ethiopian women. Under the pretense of holding back the crowd from initially going near the stage, security guards, as I observed, brazenly and unnecessarily hugged the bodies of these women and groped them, one after another.

Nearby, a random guy with thickly gelled hair in his early thirties kept close to two young Ethiopian women, who were dancing and generally enjoying themselves. He walked up to one of them and put his arm around her waist and tried to pull her toward him. She waved her hand and moved away. He followed her and tried again. Again, she refused and moved away. This happened three times before he gave up and moved on to other groups of dancing women, who were too ecstatic to be on guard. I walked up to the harassed woman and asked her if she knew this guy. Looking scared and angry, she said, “No. He’s crazy. I said no.”

I guess some men there just wouldn’t take no for an answer.

Even more galling, was an older man with a walkie-talkie who kept on getting too close to women who were jumping up and down and singing along. Some women noticed, got annoyed and moved, but this didn’t deter him from leaning against other, inattentive women. His expression was one of lascivious bliss, as if he were saying, “Ah, this is the kind of place I want to be when I die.” I felt disgusted.

How sad that even when a whole event is dedicated to the 40,000 Ethiopian women who live and work in Lebanon, it is still tainted by leering men, driven in equal parts by exoticizing curiosity and blatant lust, who somehow believe that they are entitled to touching and enjoying Ethiopian women’s bodies anytime they want. These men would likely have no problem endorsing the sentiment I heard one man outside the sports center saying to an Ethiopian woman: “Yalla [Let’s go], Sri Lankiyyeh*!”

* Literally, this means “Sri Lankan woman,” and as women from Sri Lanka are the first and most populous of foreign domestic workers in this country, the term, “Sri Lankiyyeh” has simply become a derogatory and racist term for “foreign maid.”

Link to original article

read more...

Friday, May 14, 2010

Article in Nepalese news.com: Migrant Nepalese celebrate May Day in Lebanon

Nepalese migrant workers in Lebanon celebrated Labour Day, popularly called May Day, for the first time by participating in a rally organised to mark the day.

In Lebanon, the number of Nepalese migrant workers is increasing at a faster rate in recent years.

In the past, many Nepalese were afraid to take part in the protest for fear of retribution by their employers or of being arrested by the police. But this year the Nepalese workers showed their courage, joined the protest and proudly displayed their national flag.

At least nine Nepali migrant workers attended the march this year, including the founder president and chief advisor of the NRNA-Lebanon Dipendra Uprety, current president of the NRNA-Lebanon Dilli Poudel, vice president Mohan Prasai, secretary Nanda Raj Kafle, and members Yang Bahadur Magar, Gita Ghimire, Nita Kafle, Devi Prasad Bimali and Basanti Rai.

The Nepalese migrant workers and all those who took part in the protest hope that demonstrations drew attention on the human rights violations being committed on these workers.

Studies have shown that more than half of all migrant domestic workers in Lebanon work more than 12 hours a day, some as much as 19 hours a day with no additional pay for the extra time they put in. nepalnews.com

Link to original article
read more...

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Article in Lebanon Daily Star: Cabinet approves draft to grant foreign husbands residency after 1 year of marriage

BEIRUT: Cabinet approved Wednesday a draft decree granting foreigners married to Lebanese women a residency permit after one year of marriage as well as granting their children whether adults or minors a three-year residency.
read more...

Jakarta Globe article: Workers’ Rights Start At Home: Activists

As the government pushes for protection of domestic workers overseas, activists on Sunday said it must start by passing a law guaranteeing their right to fair treatment here at home.

A bill being deliberated by a House of Representatives commission would mandate certain protections for domestic workers in Indonesia, which its supporters say is a crucial step before the country can negotiate protections of its workers elsewhere.

Rieke Diah Pitaloka, a Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) lawmaker and member of House Commission IX overseeing health, manpower and trans­migration issues, which is deliberating the bill, told the Jakarta Globe that the legislation would set the tone for future deals with other governments to provide better working conditions for Indonesians working in such countries as Malaysia.

Rieke said 80 percent of Indonesian migrant workers were domestic workers.

Activists campaigning with the National Network for Domestic Workers Advocacy (Jala PRT) have been calling for such a law since 2004.

Jala PRT chairwoman Lita Anggraini lambasted the Ministry of Manpower and Trans­migration for not doing enough to help push the bill through.

The ministry denies dragging its feet on the issue. Myra Maria Hanartani, the ministry’s director general for industrial relations development and workers’ social security, told the Globe, “It’s not that we don’t support the bill or are politically disinclined to it; we just can’t comment on it because we haven’t seen a copy of it yet.”

From 2005 to 2009, Jala PRT received 472 reports of domestic workers facing abuse by their employers, ranging from sexual harassment to withholding of wages and overwork.

Lita said the bill should include provisions for a weekly day off, standardized salaries, clear working hours and time for schooling or other opportunities for self-betterment.

Live-in domestic workers in Jakarta earn between Rp 400,000 and Rp 500,000 ($44-$55) a month, while in Yogyakarta they earn between Rp 300,000 and Rp 350,000, according to Jala PRT. The city-mandated minimum wage in Jakarta is Rp 1.1 million, but domestic workers are not eligible for it, given the lack of government recognition of the job as formal employment.

“We really need to pass this bill and get rid of the feudal system,” Rieke said.

Link to original article
read more...

Daily Star: NGO organizes public discussion about plight of domestic workers

BEIRUT: Awareness about the plight of migrant domestic workers has grown but activists are still having trouble arousing the interest of the general public on the issue.

Hoping to attract wider involvement, non-governmental organization Nahwa al-Muwatiniya on Monday held a public discussion on the rights of migrants.

There are about 200,000 female migrant domestic workers in Lebanon. As they are not included in the Lebanese labor laws, they are vulnerable to exploitation. The laws governing migrant workers were formulated before “the explosion in their numbers,” said Beirut director of Human Rights Watch Nadim Houry.

He said there were over 500 recruitment agencies registered in the country, with an increasing number being granted licenses each year. But asking the authorities about the number of agencies blacklisted for abusive practices was “like asking for a state secret,” Houry said, urging greater transparency from the government.

A recruitment agency official said a syndicate for agencies and an accompanying website had recently been established to help organize the industry and protect workers. “Agencies must be more educated” about their obligations, he said, but noted they were “not law enforcers.”

Aimee, a Malagasy community leader who has lived in Lebanon for 12 years, told listeners about when she first came to the country. When she arrived at her employer’s house, “she didn’t smile or introduce herself … I didn’t even know her name or [phone] number.” She said she had to “fight” to be able to go to church on Sundays, let alone have a day off.

Although a complaints hotline is being established by the Labor Ministry for migrant workers and their employers, participants said it remained to be seen how effective it would be. “Who is on the other end of that hotline?” asked Father Martin McDermott, who has pioneered migrant rights in Lebanon. – The Daily Star

read more...

Human Rights Watch website publishes report on migrant workers

Middle East/Asia: Partial Reforms Fail Migrant Domestic Workers
On International Labor Day, Governments Should Pledge to Make Comprehensive Reforms
April 28, 2010

(New York) - The reforms undertaken by Middle Eastern and Asian governments fall far short of the minimum protections needed to tackle abuses against migrant domestic workers, Human Rights Watch said today in a report released in advance of May 1, International Labor Day. Despite recent improvements, millions of Asian and African women workers remain at high risk of exploitation and violence, with little hope of redress, Human Rights Watch said.

The 26-page report, "Slow Reform: Protection of Migrant Domestic Workers in Asia and the Middle East," reviews conditions in eight countries with large numbers of migrant domestic workers: Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Singapore, and Malaysia. The report surveys progress in extending protection to domestic workers under labor laws, reforming immigration "sponsorship" systems that contribute to abuse, ensuring effective response by police and courts to physical and sexual violence, and allowing civil society and trade unions to organize.

"Several governments have made concrete improvements for migrant domestic workers in the past five years, but in general, reforms have been slow, incremental, and hard-fought," said Nisha Varia, women's rights researcher at Human Rights Watch. "Jordan deserves credit for including domestic work in their labor law, but enforcement remains a big concern. Singapore has prosecuted physical abuse against domestic workers vigorously, but fails to guarantee them even one day off a week."

Several countries across the Middle East and Asia host significant numbers of migrant domestic workers, ranging from 196,000 in Singapore and 200,000 in Lebanon to approximately 660,000 in Kuwait and 1.5 million in Saudi Arabia. Migrant domestic work is an important source of employment for women from Indonesia, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Nepal, India, and Ethiopia. Migrant domestic workers' earnings constitute a significant proportion of the billions of dollars of remittances sent to these countries each year.

Human Rights Watch research over the past five years has shown that migrant domestic workers risk a range of abuses. Common complaints include unpaid wages, excessive working hours with no time for rest, and heavy debt burdens from exorbitant recruitment fees. Isolation in private homes and forced confinement in the workplace contribute to psychological, physical, and sexual violence, forced labor, and trafficking.

"Reforms often encounter stiff resistance both from employers used to having a domestic worker on call around the clock and labor brokers profiting handsomely off a poorly regulated system," Varia said. "Governments should make protecting these vulnerable workers a priority."

Most governments exclude domestic workers from their main labor laws, denying them protections guaranteed to other workers, such as limits to hours of work or a weekly day of rest. Only Jordan has amended its labor law to include domestic workers, guaranteeing protections such as monthly payment of salaries into a bank account, a weekly day off, paid annual and sick leave, and a maximum 10-hour workday. However, domestic workers cannot leave the workplace without permission from their employer.

The governments of Lebanon, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and Malaysia have all publicly announced they will amend existing labor laws or draft new legislation on domestic work. But despite years of proposals, none have adopted such reforms. Saudi Arabia's Shura Council approved an annex on domestic work to the labor law, but the cabinet has not yet approved it. Singapore's Ministry of Manpower has repeatedly rejected calls to extend labor law protections to domestic workers.

"Instead of ensuring protection under labor laws, governments have relied on creating standard employment contracts or bilateral agreements with labor-sending countries, Varia said. "Employment contracts and bilateral agreements may be better than nothing, but with weaker protections than labor laws, they effectively reinforce discrimination against domestic workers."

Immigration reforms have proceeded even more slowly than labor reforms, Human Rights Watch said. In the countries surveyed, domestic workers migrate on fixed-term visas, under which their employers double as their immigration sponsors. This system heightens the risk of abuse by giving inordinate control to employers, who can have domestic workers sent home at will or prohibit them from being hired by a new employer.

"Governments have dragged their feet on reforms to the immigration sponsorship system, which contributes to forced labor and trafficking," Varia said. "They need to move quickly to find alternatives, such as shifting sponsorship from employers to labor authorities or closely monitored employment agencies."

Human Rights Watch also examined the governments' responses to criminal abuses against domestic workers. Some governments have begun to investigate and successfully prosecute abuse against domestic workers, but numerous obstacles continue to stand in the way of such victories, Human Rights Watch found. For example, systems for filing complaints are often out of reach of domestic workers trapped in private homes and unable to speak the local language.

For cases that do reach the attention of the authorities, legal proceedings often stretch over years, while victims typically wait in overcrowded shelters, unable to work. The lengthy waits and uncertain outcomes cause many domestic workers to withdraw their complaints or negotiate financial settlements so they can return home quickly. In other cases, domestic workers who bring charges are forced to defend themselves against counter-allegations of theft, witchcraft, and adultery.

"Successful prosecutions of abusive employers and labor brokers is not only justice served but also a strong deterrent against abuse," Varia said. Governments should establish accessible ways to file complaints, expedite legal proceedings, and ensure a minimum standard of social services, such as shelter and health care, during the process."

Reforms on regulating domestic work are taking place not only at the national level, but globally. In recognition of the importance of protecting a major source of employment that has been historically neglected, members of the International Labor Organization will begin formal discussions in June to establish global labor standards for domestic work. Lebanon, Bahrain, and Jordan support legally binding standards, while Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates support a nonbinding recommendation. Singapore and Kuwait did not submit official responses.

Human Rights Watch urged governments to take the following steps to prevent and respond to abuses against migrant domestic workers:

  • Extend equal labor protections in national law to domestic workers, and address unique circumstances relating to their intermittent working hours, lodging, and board;
  • Improve regulation and oversight of employment agencies and fees charged to these workers by private recruitment agencies;
  • Reform immigration policies so that workers' visas are not tied to individual sponsors, and so that they can change employers without the first employer's consent;
  • Improve workers' access to the criminal justice system, including through confidential complaint mechanisms, prosecutions, and expansion of victim services;
  • Cooperate with labor-sending countries to monitor transnational recruitment, respond to complaints of abuse, and facilitate repatriation;
  • Support a binding convention on domestic work with an accompanying recommendation during the International Labour Conference in June.

read more...

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Bikya Masr: Lebanon: Give women their right to pass on nationality to their children

Amnesty International urges the Lebanese authorities to withdraw immediately an appeal they have filed against a landmark court ruling of June of last year allowing a Lebanese woman to pass on her nationality to her children.

The organization is deeply concerned that the Lebanese authorities are seeking to overturn such a landmark decision instead of implementing the court ruling and ensuring that Lebanon complies with its international obligations not to discriminate against women. If the Civil Chamber of the Court of Appeal overturns the decision, it will shatter hopes of thousands of children born to Lebanese mothers and foreign national fathers, who are treated as foreigners in their own country and denied access to public education and other services.

The Civil Chamber of the Court of Appeal that handles personal status cases is scheduled to hear on Tuesday 13 April 2010 the case of Samira Soueidan, a Lebanese citizen who was granted the right to pass on her nationality to three of her Lebanon-born children by the Fifth Camber of the Court of First Instance in Mount Lebanon’s Jdeidit al-Metn on June 16, 2009.

Samira Soueidan had initiated proceedings after her husband, an Egyptian national, passed away in 1994. In 2005, she filed a new lawsuit against the Lebanese state to challenge Law no. 15 of 1925 which grants the nationality and citizenship of children through the father only.

Under Lebanese law, women, unlike men, cannot pass on their nationality to their spouses or children. The children of Lebanese women married to a foreign national can not obtain Lebanese nationality. Non-Lebanese men married to Lebanese women also cannot get Lebanese citizenship, whereas non-Lebanese women married to Lebanese men can acquire the Lebanese nationality after one year of marriage. Such provisions in Lebanese law are in clear violation of Lebanon’s obligations under international law, including the principle of non discrimination (Article 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)), the principle on equality between men and women (article 3 of the ICCPR) and equality before the law (Article 26 of the ICCRP).

Disregarding such discriminatory provisions, judges John Qazzi, Rana Habaka, and Lamis Kazma argued in their June ruling that Article 7 of Lebanon’s Constitution asserts the principle of equality before the law for all citizens, men and women. They, therefore, granted Samira Soueidan the right to confer her nationality to her children. However, this court decision was challenged by the public prosecution and a legal commission at the Ministry of Justice on behalf of the Lebanese state in July and September respectively.

In addition to such discriminatory provisions in the law, women’s inability to pass their nationality to their spouses and children has a pervasive effect on the entire family. Spouses and children must continuously secure residency and work permits that enables them to live and work legally in Lebanon. The children are considered residents, not citizens, and consequently are denied the rights enjoyed by nationals regarding access to education, and later employment.

By opposing the June court ruling only months before Lebanon is scheduled to come under scrutiny in the framework of the Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council sends a worrying message that the Lebanese state persists to undermine the cornerstone principle of non discrimination..

It also shows that the state is ignoring the concluding comments made by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women in its fortieth session in 2008. The Committee regretted Lebanon’s assertion that it cannot, for political reasons, amend its nationality law to allow Lebanese women to pass their nationality to their children and foreign spouses. The Committee urged Lebanon to recognize the negative impact of its nationality law on Lebanese women married to foreigners and on the children of those women and, accordingly, revise its nationality law and remove its reservation to article 9, paragraph 2.

Amnesty International calls on the Lebanese authorities to take immediate steps to review existing legislation containing discriminatory provisions against women and follow the steps taken by Algeria, Egypt and Morocco which have amended their nationality laws in recent years to grant women the right to give their nationality to their children and spouse.

Background:


In Lebanon, Law No. 15 of 1925 states that mothers are allowed to confer their nationality to their children only in two specific cases:

If a Lebanese mother can giver her nationality to her child if he or she is born from an out-of-wedlock relationship, and the father is unknown.

If a non-Lebanese mother of minor children from a previous marriage to a non-Lebanese father, who acquires the Lebanese nationality from a Lebanese husband, can confer her Lebanese nationality to her minor non-Lebanese children upon the death of her Lebanese husband.

Children born to Lebanese mothers and foreign national fathers face impediments regarding basic rights such as the right to education. Law No. 686 of 1998, which amended Article 49 of Decree No. 134/59 provides that: “Public education is free and compulsory in the primary phase, and is a right to every Lebanese in the primary education age.” By specifying that only Lebanese children have a right to free primary education, the children of a Lebanese mother and a foreign father are denied equal access to education. This law is in breach of Lebanon’s obligation, under Article 28 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) to which Lebanon is a state party, Lebanon has an obligation to “make primary education compulsory and available free to all.”

When children reach the age of 18, those with Lebanese mothers and foreign fathers have to find employers willing to obtain work permits that require them to pay high financial fees. For this reason, employers usually avoid recruiting them.

Original Bikya Masr article
read more...

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Bikya Masr reports: Lebanon: Investigate seizure of human rights lawyer’s passport

Bikya Masr Staff
9 March 2010 in Lebanon, News

BEIRUT: The Lebanese government should investigate the seizure of a human rights lawyer’s passport by General Security, a group of 16‎ Lebanese and international human rights organizations said today.

General Security withheld the British passport for the lawyer, Nizar Saghieh, a dual British and Lebanese citizen, on March 2, without providing any justification. The passport was returned on March 4, following the direct intervention of Interior Minister Ziad Baroud. Saghieh had recently represented four Iraqi refugees in their lawsuits against the Lebanese state for illegal detention by General Security, resulting in court orders for their immediate release.

“We are concerned that General Security singled out Nizar Saghieh for harassment because of his role in defending Iraqi refugees,” the organizations said. “The government should investigate the reasons for General Security’s behavior and ensure that no human rights activist is harassed for his or her activities.”

The passport was withheld after a travel agency sent General Security 13 passports of government representatives and civil society activists, including Saghieh’s, for approval to send them to Amman, Jordan, to seek visas for travel to Bosnia-Herzegovina. The passports had to be sent to Jordan because there is no Bosnian embassy in Lebanon. The trip’s purpose was to study Bosnia’s experience in dealing with enforced disappearances and mass graves.

When the travel agency went to retrieve the passports, General Security returned the others but said, without providing any reason that they intended to summon Saghieh to come in person to retrieve his. The trip for the entire group has been postponed as a result. General Security is the security institution in charge of immigration and passport formalities in Lebanon.

While the organizations said they were relieved that the passport was returned following the minister’s intervention, they expressed concern that General Security had withheld the passport to intimidate Saghieh.

The organizations also called on Lebanon to respect human rights lawyers and to abide by the principles enunciated in the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on December 9, 1998, particularly Article 12. That article calls on governments to “take all necessary measures to ensure the protection by the competent authorities of everyone, against any violence, threats, retaliation, de facto or de jure adverse discrimination, pressure or any other arbitrary action as a consequence of his or her legitimate exercise” of their rights as a human rights defender.

The organizations also urged the bar associations of Beirut and Northern Lebanon to ensure that their members are not harassed for their work as lawyers.

Background

Saghieh has worked on a number of human rights issues, including arbitrary detention of refugees, access to information for the families of persons forcibly disappeared during Lebanon’s civil war, and censorship. Most recently, he successfully represented the four Iraqi refugees in separate lawsuits against the state, seeking their immediate release from detention at the General Security jail after they had finished serving sentences. General Security has released only one of the four despite the court decisions calling for their immediate release.

Saghieh’s activism has caused him trouble with General Security in the past. In 2003, General Security issued an order prohibiting him from entering General Security buildings or conducting any “formality” in it. The order remains in place even though there is no basis under Lebanese law for such an order. The order was issued after Saghieh had acted as legal counsel for Frontiers Center, a non-governmental organization acting mainly on behalf of refugees, in the context of the harassment of the center’s director, Samira Trad.

Lebanon is a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which states in article 12 that “Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own.” The Covenant prohibits states from imposing restrictions on this right “except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant.”

The organizations are:

1. The International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ)

2. Human Rights Watch (HRW)

3. Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network (EMHRN)

4. Alkarama

5. Agir Ensemble pour les Droits de l’Homme

6. Action des Chrétiens pour l’Abolition de la Torture (ACAT-France)

7. Restart Center for rehabilitation of victims of violence and torture (Restart)

8. The Committee for the Families of the Kidnapped and Disappeared in Lebanon (CFKDL)

9. Khiam Rehabilitation Center for Victims of Torture

10. Centre Libanais pour les Droits de l’Homme (CLDH)

11. Support of Lebanese in Detention and Exile (SOLIDE)

12. The Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders (a joint programme of the International Federation for Human Rights and the World Organization Against Torture)

13. UMAM Documentation and Research (UMAM D&R)

14. Frontiers Ruwad Association

15. Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PINACLE)

16. ALEF – Act for Human Rights
read more...