Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts

Monday, March 29, 2010

Article in Africa Review: Stranded moments for immigrants

Foreign women detainees at the General Security Retention Centre in Lebanon. Photo/A CORRESPONDENT

By SARA PERSSON (email the author)

Posted Thursday, March 11 2010 at 11:42

In Summary

  • Around 200,000 migrant workers currently stranded in Lebanon

  • Majority of domestic workers trapped in the Middle East are from Ethiopia, Madagascar, Kenya, West Africa and Morocco

  • Scores of women are lured to the Middle East by agencies' false promises of a new and prosperous life

Charming pre- Biblical landmarks and archaeological delights dot Lebanon, especially for visitors on tour: The natural beautiful wonder Jeita River, even Mount Lebanon that symbolises relaxation. But that is just for tourists; thousands of Africans, lured by this beauty to work here as househelps, have a different picture of this ancient country.

Ms Abebe was only 21 when an employment agency visited her village. The job, as the agents described it, sounded like heaven. But what the agent did not tell her was that as a maid in Lebanon, she was to live among the lowest of the low.

"The family pushes you like they own you," she recalls. "I suffered abuse from the father, his son and his friends. But I was lucky because they never hit me."

After nine months of service, she fled. "I had hoped that if I went to the police, they would help me. But they interrogated me in Arabic, so I couldn’t answer. Then they jailed me because I didn’t have my papers." She was lucky when a Kenyan woman came to her rescue.

Stranded in Lebanon

Abebe is one of 200,000 migrant workers currently in Lebanon, where a large part of the female lot are from Ethiopia, Madagascar, Kenya, West Africa and Morocco.

Low wages make them affordable (the minimum monthly wage for an Ethiopian maid is $100) even in low-income households at the same time as it grants the employer family social status and prestige, and this is a trend apparent all over the Middle East, where the number of female migrant workers has skyrocketed.

At the same time, in 2009, remittances to sub-Saharan Africa from the Middle East amounted to $7 billion, according to the International Organisation for Migration.

The women who travel to work in Lebanon are often lured by agencies' false promises of a new and prosperous life in the Middle East. The agencies tend to approach rural areas where people are poor and uneducated. Other women travel because a family member has already done so. But the main driver is poverty.

As Ms Abebe says, the working conditions in most cases are far from ideal, which is not explained to the girls when they are lured by the agents, often from rural areas, under false pretences. Many of the women who arrive in the Middle East have signed a contract they don’t understand.

They have to work long hours, seven days a week, as prisoners in the houses where they live. Agencies often overcharge the workers, thus creating a debt-bondage and because maids don't have employee status, except in Bahrain and Jordan, the girls and women live without any form of legal protection in an environment where physical- and psychological abuse and economic exploitation are common.

Debt bondage

“Some of it derives from a peculiar form of racism that is socio-economic,” Nadim Houry from the Human Rights Watch (HRW) explains. In colloquial Arabic, black people are referred to as abed, which means slave. Maids are seen as property that perform the work that people in the Middle East won’t do themselves.” This form of racism is perhaps best illustrated on the Lebanese beaches where in summertime, you have signs that read; “no domestic workers,” he adds.

Some doctors in Lebanon believe that it is the isolation that has driven some women to commit suicide by jumping from highrise buildings. But the police reports, seen by this paper, are often unclear and in a number of cases, authorities have too quickly concluded that the young women had fallen off buildings while they were cleaning windows.

“Other people have tried to pass off the suicides among migrant workers in the Ethiopian community saying they were crazy and have higher suicide rates anyway,” Nadim Houry at HRW explained in an interview.

In an attempt to halt the number of deaths, Ethiopia recently imposed restrictions on travel to Lebanon. But this only applies to women who are offered a minimum wage that is below $100 per month, and rather than help the situation, it is believed to have fuelled trafficking through third countries like Yemen, a Trafficking in Persons (TIP)-report has found out. The same report argued that by definition, movement of people from one country to another, under coercion and exploitation, is trafficking.

Unable to leave out of debt bondage and illegal exploitation by host families, as well as agencies, many of the women who come to the Middle East end up in prison.

Legal hurdles

In Lebanon, the women are kept in the General Security Retention Centre, an underground prison with no natural light or ventilation, and no hot water, and “aggressive and brutal” male guards.

It is the least transparent prison in Lebanon, in contravention of Lebanese law.

“We could be up to 60 people in one cell at times,” Abebe explained, and adding: “The hygiene was a nightmare and there were no female guardians. At that time of month, women cannot get pads. It was horrible and degrading. They made you move around handcuffed and treated us like villains. Yes, I would rather die than go back there.

Abebe now lives in a legal limbo unable to return to Ethiopia, caught in a debt-bondage between her former host-family, who filed a counter report of theft when she went to the police, and General Security for overstaying her visa. But she has no work permit and cannot get legal representation. She was unable to continue the conversation.

New legislation has been approved in Bahrain, Jordan and Lebanon, but there is no body to enforce the law due to an absent state, lack of clarity and lack of protection against abuse.

Lebanon has been added to the US State Department human trafficking tier 2 watchlist for coercion and exploitation.

read more...

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Nepal: Managing foreign employment

Photo by: KarlMarx

An opinion piece written in local Nepalese online news site My Republic offers this opinion from the Nepalese Ministry of Labour on how to deal with the situation of Nepalese migrant workers going abroad:

Original link to article: Managing foreign employment

BISHAL BHATTARAI

Contribution of remittance to Nepal’s Gross Domestic Product is estimated to be about 20 percent, meaning it is greater than the combined amount of foreign loan/grants and foreign direct investment. Remittance has singularly helped to bring down the level of poverty in the country. The Nepal Living Standard Survey 2003 has also substantiated its increasing contribution in the overall poverty reduction of the country from 42 to 31 percent.

The major question with remittances coming from Nepali migrant workers is whether it is sustainable or not. Foreign employment is mostly determined by internal demand of the destination countries where Nepali policymakers do not have any control. Recent economic meltdown also exposed its vulnerability. Fortunately, Nepali migrant workers did not suffer as much as it was estimated earlier but the danger is always there. Too much dependency on foreign employment without commensurate efforts to generate additional employment opportunities in the internal labor market is always a threat to the national economy.

Each year, almost half of the new entrants in the Nepali labor market go to foreign countries seeking better employment opportunities. It is pathetic to note that most of them land up in an even worse condition in foreign soils. The increasing number of complaints at the Nepali embassies abroad and the increase of organizations concerning protection of migrant workers in Nepal show the mismanagement prevalent in this sector. Till date, the government of Nepal continues to be a passive onlooker. Its initiatives lack the vigor, determination and enthusiasm of other major labor sending countries such as the Philippines and Sri Lanka.

It seems that successive governments have always been in a dilemma whether to promote foreign employment or better utilize the manpower for the nation-building process. It is better to learn as quickly as possible that remittance from abroad does not make a nation. If it had been the case, the Philippines would have by now been one of the highly-developed countries of the world.

However, given the poor socioeconomic scenario of the country, foreign employment, apart from foreign assistance, has turned out to be another necessary evil, at least for the time being. Hence, it should be treated as a stopgap arrangement until we are in a position to utilize human resources for our own needs. At the same time, additional efforts are needed to make current workers more productive and reduce our increasing dependency on foreign employment.

Too much dependency on foreign employment without commensurate efforts to generate additional employment opportunities in the internal labor market is always a threat to the national economy.
Value addition to the Nepali migrant workers along with better coordination among the major stakeholders is among the primary requirements for safe, dignified and reliable foreign employment. The existing Labor Desk at the International Airport is an example of poor coordination among the major stakeholders.

It is ironical to note that though the foreign employment sector has been contributing immensely to the national economy, the sector is not getting its due from the national budget. The miserable state of the Ministry of Labor and Transport Management in terms of physical, financial, human and information resources clearly shows the misplaced priority of the government. Moreover, the present structure of the ministry where two heterogeneous functions (foreign employment and transport) have been combined needs to be revisited for specialization and better results.

So far, the Government of Nepal has signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with four major labor destination countries: Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and the Republic of Korea. However, these are very few considering that institutionally 107 countries are open for Nepali migrant workers. Signing MoU with other major labor destination countries such as Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Kuwait and Israel is a daunting task for the government. But just signing MoU is not sufficient; persistent follow-up is required, which is seriously amiss right now.

It is believed that the appointment of labor attaché helps in creating a conducive environment in labor diplomacy. However, until now they have been unable to rise above regular functions and show their presence in an effective manner. For instance, frequent closure of the Israeli labor market, which is among the most lucrative destinations for Nepali female migrant workers, aptly sums Nepal’s attitude and caliber in managing foreign employment.

An effective and a meaningful presence of the state for optimum management of foreign employment is a must. Simply elucidating the statistics of foreign employment and gloating over its immense contribution to the national economy will not serve the purpose. We have had enough self-congratulatory seminars, workshops, foreign visits and meetings. Now, it is the time to act and act with purpose. Otherwise, we will once again be left behind to rue over lost opportunities.

(Writer is with Ministry of Labor and Transport Management.)
read more...