Showing posts with label remittances. Show all posts
Showing posts with label remittances. Show all posts

Friday, May 14, 2010

Article in Al Masry al Youm: As Gulf economies decline, Egyptian migrants suffer


Sayyed Mohamed returned to his village in Assiut three months ago in search of a new beginning. After spending most of his adult life in Kuwait, the 46-year-old driver was dismissed from Hashim al-Shakhs company, a leading Kuwaiti importer and distributor of paper products, where he worked for several years. Forced to cut jobs due to a budget squeeze, the company informed Mohamed that they were no longer interested in retaining their older employees.

His story is shared by many other Egyptians who have recently been displaced from their jobs in Gulf states. Since the onset of the global financial crisis in 2008, many expatriate workers have suddenly been forced to return to Egypt, leaving behind the livelihoods that sustained them for decades.

Egyptians working abroad constitute an important sector of Egypt’s labor economy and the money they send home each year provides essential support for their families back home.

Egypt has long been a regional labor exporter, especially to the Gulf states, Jordan and Libya. Since the government lifted restrictions on migration in the mid-1970s, Egyptians began leaving in large numbers to find work abroad.

As a result of the oil boom, the Gulf began attracting many workers from neighboring Arab countries. While emigration patterns since then have fluctuated--due to changing oil prices, political developments, and a turn toward South Asian migrant labor--many Egyptians have nonetheless continued traveling to the Gulf in search of economic prosperity. Dubai's construction boom in the mid-2000s strengthened this pattern, absorbing migrant workers from around the region.

Remittances secure the livelihoods of many Egyptians and represent a significant portion of Egypt's national income. In 2008, the World Bank reported that Egypt was among the top ten remittance recipients in the world. But in the aftermath of the financial crisis, Egypt witnessed a significant drop in cash transfers from abroad, from which it has not yet recovered.

The Central Bank of Egypt estimates that remittances in the second quarter of 2009-2010 reached only US$1.7 billion, a low point since the start of the crisis. The actual size of the drop, however, is difficult to represent in official figures, as many migrants transfer money through informal channels rather than banks and licensed money exchanges.

Since late 2008, job cuts in the Gulf states have been on the rise, affecting both professionals and unskilled migrant workers. With the termination of their contracts, many workers who were only hired on a temporary basis have been forced to return to their countries of origin. Worker repatriation has thus served as a mechanism for Gulf states to offload the social distress caused by the financial crisis on to neighboring Arab and South Asian countries, including Egypt, while absolving themselves of any responsibility to provide for the well-being of their migrant workers.

"I worked for a small company where I made roughly LE3000 per month; overall life was good," says Mohamed.

Like most other expatriate workers in the Gulf, Mohamed was hired as a temporary worker, renewing his contract and visa every two years. His monthly salary was enough to support his wife and five children in Egypt. But since his return, making ends meet has been a challenge. He now works as a self-employed driver, transporting passengers from his village to a local town.

"Since returning to Egypt, I've only seen bitterness. I can barely make enough money to provide for my family."

According to renowned Egyptian economist Ahmed Sayyed el-Naggar, it is difficult to assess the impact of the recent crisis on Egyptian expatriate workers and, in turn, on the Egyptian economy. “Since the beginning of the crisis, the repatriation of Egyptians from the Gulf has not been represented in any official statistics, neither from the Egyptian Ministry of Manpower nor from the Gulf states.”

El-Naggar estimates that up to 300,000 Egyptians may have returned from the Gulf, especially those working in construction, real estate, trade, and services. He predicts that the most immediate effect of worker repatriation will be a rise in the Egyptian unemployment rate, which currently sits at around ten percent, according to official statistics.

“Egypt already has a high unemployment rate, and with the return of these workers it is expected to increase,” he says.

Meanwhile, el-Naggar says, the Egyptian government's response has been grossly inadequate: "The government implemented contractionary fiscal policies last year in order to reduce spending, a strategy which will not create more job opportunities."

It is still uncertain when remittance levels will rebound and what opportunities foreign labor markets may hold for Egyptian migrant workers in the near future. But those who have returned to Egypt add another layer to the growing social pressures that have been fueling public demands for government intervention to improve income levels and living standards for working people--demands which were made manifestly clear in this week's demonstrations for a national minimum wage.

read more...

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Nepal: Managing foreign employment

Photo by: KarlMarx

An opinion piece written in local Nepalese online news site My Republic offers this opinion from the Nepalese Ministry of Labour on how to deal with the situation of Nepalese migrant workers going abroad:

Original link to article: Managing foreign employment

BISHAL BHATTARAI

Contribution of remittance to Nepal’s Gross Domestic Product is estimated to be about 20 percent, meaning it is greater than the combined amount of foreign loan/grants and foreign direct investment. Remittance has singularly helped to bring down the level of poverty in the country. The Nepal Living Standard Survey 2003 has also substantiated its increasing contribution in the overall poverty reduction of the country from 42 to 31 percent.

The major question with remittances coming from Nepali migrant workers is whether it is sustainable or not. Foreign employment is mostly determined by internal demand of the destination countries where Nepali policymakers do not have any control. Recent economic meltdown also exposed its vulnerability. Fortunately, Nepali migrant workers did not suffer as much as it was estimated earlier but the danger is always there. Too much dependency on foreign employment without commensurate efforts to generate additional employment opportunities in the internal labor market is always a threat to the national economy.

Each year, almost half of the new entrants in the Nepali labor market go to foreign countries seeking better employment opportunities. It is pathetic to note that most of them land up in an even worse condition in foreign soils. The increasing number of complaints at the Nepali embassies abroad and the increase of organizations concerning protection of migrant workers in Nepal show the mismanagement prevalent in this sector. Till date, the government of Nepal continues to be a passive onlooker. Its initiatives lack the vigor, determination and enthusiasm of other major labor sending countries such as the Philippines and Sri Lanka.

It seems that successive governments have always been in a dilemma whether to promote foreign employment or better utilize the manpower for the nation-building process. It is better to learn as quickly as possible that remittance from abroad does not make a nation. If it had been the case, the Philippines would have by now been one of the highly-developed countries of the world.

However, given the poor socioeconomic scenario of the country, foreign employment, apart from foreign assistance, has turned out to be another necessary evil, at least for the time being. Hence, it should be treated as a stopgap arrangement until we are in a position to utilize human resources for our own needs. At the same time, additional efforts are needed to make current workers more productive and reduce our increasing dependency on foreign employment.

Too much dependency on foreign employment without commensurate efforts to generate additional employment opportunities in the internal labor market is always a threat to the national economy.
Value addition to the Nepali migrant workers along with better coordination among the major stakeholders is among the primary requirements for safe, dignified and reliable foreign employment. The existing Labor Desk at the International Airport is an example of poor coordination among the major stakeholders.

It is ironical to note that though the foreign employment sector has been contributing immensely to the national economy, the sector is not getting its due from the national budget. The miserable state of the Ministry of Labor and Transport Management in terms of physical, financial, human and information resources clearly shows the misplaced priority of the government. Moreover, the present structure of the ministry where two heterogeneous functions (foreign employment and transport) have been combined needs to be revisited for specialization and better results.

So far, the Government of Nepal has signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with four major labor destination countries: Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and the Republic of Korea. However, these are very few considering that institutionally 107 countries are open for Nepali migrant workers. Signing MoU with other major labor destination countries such as Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Kuwait and Israel is a daunting task for the government. But just signing MoU is not sufficient; persistent follow-up is required, which is seriously amiss right now.

It is believed that the appointment of labor attaché helps in creating a conducive environment in labor diplomacy. However, until now they have been unable to rise above regular functions and show their presence in an effective manner. For instance, frequent closure of the Israeli labor market, which is among the most lucrative destinations for Nepali female migrant workers, aptly sums Nepal’s attitude and caliber in managing foreign employment.

An effective and a meaningful presence of the state for optimum management of foreign employment is a must. Simply elucidating the statistics of foreign employment and gloating over its immense contribution to the national economy will not serve the purpose. We have had enough self-congratulatory seminars, workshops, foreign visits and meetings. Now, it is the time to act and act with purpose. Otherwise, we will once again be left behind to rue over lost opportunities.

(Writer is with Ministry of Labor and Transport Management.)
read more...